Williams v. Giddens

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Williams v. Giddens

485 So. 2d 493, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 739, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7005

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 25, 1986

DocketNo. 85-2324

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 485 So. 2d 493 (Williams v. Giddens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Giddens, 485 So. 2d 493, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 739, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7005 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court order which requires both parties and the child to submit to a Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) typing blood test but disapprove of that portion of the order which states that the test shall be dispositive of paternity. This case is substantially the same as, and is controlled by, Joyner v. Hair, 485 So.2d 491 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

We remand the cause to the trial court to strike that portion of the order which states that the test shall be dispositive. The parties should be given the opportunity [494]*494to present any other evidence which is relevant and material to the issue of paternity.

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court order which requires both parties and the child to submit to a Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) typing blood test but disapprove of that portion of the order which states that the test shall be dispositive of paternity. This case is substantially the same as, and is controlled by, Joyner v. Hair, 485 So.2d 491 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

We remand the cause to the trial court to strike that portion of the order which states that the test shall be dispositive. The parties should be given the opportunity [494]*494to present any other evidence which is relevant and material to the issue of paternity.

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

485 So. 2d 493, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 739, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-giddens-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack