Williams v. Geico Government Employees Insurance
986 A.2d 45, 604 Pa. 321, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2451
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 18, 2009
Docket147 WAL 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases
This text of 986 A.2d 45 (Williams v. Geico Government Employees Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Williams v. Geico Government Employees Insurance, 986 A.2d 45, 604 Pa. 321, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2451 (Pa. 2009).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Whether, under the MVFRL and our decision in Burstein v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co., 570 Pa. 177, 809 A.2d 204 (2002), the “regular-use” exclusion to underinsured motorist coverage in an automobile insurance policy is valid where the insured is a police officer, who has sustained bodily injury in the course of performing his duties while driving a police vehicle, for which vehicle he could not have obtained underinsured motorist coverage.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rush, M. v. Erie Insurance Exchange, Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2024
Williams v. Geico Government Employees Insurance
32 A.3d 1195 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Dixon v. GEICO
1 A.3d 921 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)
Commonwealth v. Reed
986 A.2d 45 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
986 A.2d 45, 604 Pa. 321, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-geico-government-employees-insurance-pa-2009.