Williams v. Franklin Square Union Free School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Williams v. Franklin Square Union Free School District

261 A.D.2d 628, 690 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5666

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 24, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D.2d 628 (Williams v. Franklin Square Union Free School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Franklin Square Union Free School District, 261 A.D.2d 628, 690 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5666 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondents to “restore petitioner to her position as an elementary [school] teacher”, the petitioner appeals (1), as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated January 13, 1998, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination in an order dated June 19, 1997, granting the respondents’ motion to dismiss the proceeding, and (2) a judgment of the same court, dated September 25, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed (see, CPLR 5701 [b] [1]); and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

There is no evidence in the record that the respondents’ denial of tenure to the petitioner was for a legally-impermissible reason (see, Matter of Cohoes City School Dist. v Cohoes Teachers Assn., 40 NY2d 774, 777), and there is no evidence that she acquired tenure by estoppel (see, Matter of Carpenter v Board of Educ., 71 NY2d 832).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Goldstein, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondents to “restore petitioner to her position as an elementary [school] teacher”, the petitioner appeals (1), as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated January 13, 1998, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination in an order dated June 19, 1997, granting the respondents’ motion to dismiss the proceeding, and (2) a judgment of the same court, dated September 25, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.