Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Williams v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

Williams v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

425 So. 2d 1190, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 29070
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 27, 1983
DocketNo. AK-82
StatusPublished

This text of 425 So. 2d 1190 (Williams v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 425 So. 2d 1190, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 29070 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Williams complains of Parole and Probation Commission action setting her presumptive parole release date based on parole guidelines adopted subsequent to the date of her offense. We again approve the procedure applied as not being violative of the proscription against ex post facto laws and affirm the commission’s order. See Overfield v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 418 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) and May v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 424 So.2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

AFFIRMED.

MILLS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Overfield v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION
418 So. 2d 321 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
May v. Fla. Parole & Probation Com'n
424 So. 2d 122 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
425 So. 2d 1190, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 29070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-florida-parole-probation-commission-fladistctapp-1983.