Williams v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
425 So. 2d 1190, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 29070
Opinions
Williams complains of Parole and Probation Commission action setting her presumptive parole release date based on parole guidelines adopted subsequent to the date of her offense. We again approve the procedure applied as not being violative of the proscription against ex post facto laws and affirm the commission’s order. See Overfield v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 418 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) and May v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 424 So.2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 425 So. 2d 1190, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 29070 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
425 So. 2d 1190 (Williams v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Overfield v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION
418 So. 2d 321 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
May v. Fla. Parole & Probation Com'n
424 So. 2d 122 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)