Williams v. First Farmers & Merchants Nat. Bank

185 So. 737, 237 Ala. 132, 1938 Ala. LEXIS 476
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 17, 1938
Docket4 Div. 30.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 185 So. 737 (Williams v. First Farmers & Merchants Nat. Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. First Farmers & Merchants Nat. Bank, 185 So. 737, 237 Ala. 132, 1938 Ala. LEXIS 476 (Ala. 1938).

Opinions

BOULDIN, Justice.

An affirmative instruction to find for the plaintiff is a charge upon the effect of the evidence.

Error cannot, be presumed on appeal. It must affirmatively appear from the record.

It follows, this court cannot review the giving of the affirmative charge upon request in writing, unless the record on appeal affirmatively shows all the evidence considered by the trial court is presented to this court.

The present record does not purport to set out all the evidence in substance or effect.'

The ruling complained of is, therefore, not subj ect to review. Fleming v. Ussery, 30 Ala. 282; Clardy v. Walker, 132 Ala. 264, 31 So. 78; Peyton v. Apex Realty Co., 220 Ala. 81, 123 So. 898; Stafford v. Jones, 224 Ala. 583, 141 So. 246; 2 Alabama Digest, Appeal and Error, p. 729, ^ 927(6) ; 5 C.J.S., Appeal and Error, p. 361, § 1559.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and FOSTER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perdue v. Gates
403 So. 2d 165 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 So. 737, 237 Ala. 132, 1938 Ala. LEXIS 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-first-farmers-merchants-nat-bank-ala-1938.