Williams v. First City National Bank of Oxford

Supreme Court of Alabama

Williams v. First City National Bank of Oxford

448 So. 2d 344, 1984 Ala. LEXIS 3972

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedMarch 23, 1984

Docket82-1215

StatusPublished

This text of 448 So. 2d 344 (Williams v. First City National Bank of Oxford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. First City National Bank of Oxford, 448 So. 2d 344, 1984 Ala. LEXIS 3972 (Ala. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the undisputed facts in support of Defendants’ motions for summary judgment leave no genuine issue as to any material facts and entitle the Defendants to respective judgments as a matter of law as to each of Plaintiff’s claims, we have no alternative but to affirm the trial court’s grant jof summary judgment as to each Defendant. See Hart v. General Motors [345]*345Acceptance Corporation, 437 So.2d 1255 (Ala.1983).

AFFIRMED.

MADDOX, ALMON, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because the undisputed facts in support of Defendants’ motions for summary judgment leave no genuine issue as to any material facts and entitle the Defendants to respective judgments as a matter of law as to each of Plaintiff’s claims, we have no alternative but to affirm the trial court’s grant jof summary judgment as to each Defendant. See Hart v. General Motors [345]*345Acceptance Corporation, 437 So.2d 1255 (Ala.1983).

AFFIRMED.

MADDOX, ALMON, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

448 So. 2d 344, 1984 Ala. LEXIS 3972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-first-city-national-bank-of-oxford-ala-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack