Williams v. First City National Bank of Oxford

448 So. 2d 344, 1984 Ala. LEXIS 3972
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided March 23, 1984·No. 82-1215·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the undisputed facts in support of Defendants’ motions for summary judgment leave no genuine issue as to any material facts and entitle the Defendants to respective judgments as a matter of law as to each of Plaintiff’s claims, we have no alternative but to affirm the trial court’s grant jof summary judgment as to each Defendant. See Hart v. General Motors [345] Acceptance Corporation, 437 So.2d 1255 (Ala.1983).

AFFIRMED.

MADDOX, ALMON, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. First City National Bank of Oxford, 448 So. 2d 344, 1984 Ala. LEXIS 3972 (Ala. 1984).

448 So. 2d 344 (Williams v. First City National Bank of Oxford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hart v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
437 So. 2d 1255 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1983)