Williams v. Feuer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Williams v. Feuer

421 So. 2d 193, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28149

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 3, 1982·No. No. 82-1482·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a final judgment based on a default the record is clear that appellant knew the status of the proceedings at least ten months before filing his motion. Under the circumstances present here the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. Sternberg v. Barnett Bank of Fort Lauderdale, 400 So.2d 200 (Fla.4th DCA 1981). See, also, Lacore v. Giralda Bake Shop, Inc., 407 So.2d 275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Williams’ inaction, like Steinberg’s, was not legally excusable. We therefore affirm.

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a final judgment based on a default the record is clear that appellant knew the status of the proceedings at least ten months before filing his motion. Under the circumstances present here the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. Sternberg v. Barnett Bank of Fort Lauderdale, 400 So.2d 200 (Fla.4th DCA 1981). See, also, Lacore v. Giralda Bake Shop, Inc., 407 So.2d 275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Williams’ inaction, like Steinberg’s, was not legally excusable. We therefore affirm.

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Williams v. Feuer, 421 So. 2d 193, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28149 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

421 So. 2d 193 (Williams v. Feuer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related