Williams v. Feuer

421 So. 2d 193, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28149
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 3, 1982
DocketNo. 82-1482
StatusPublished

This text of 421 So. 2d 193 (Williams v. Feuer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Feuer, 421 So. 2d 193, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28149 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a final judgment based on a default the record is clear that appellant knew the status of the proceedings at least ten months before filing his motion. Under the circumstances present here the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. Sternberg v. Barnett Bank of Fort Lauderdale, 400 So.2d 200 (Fla.4th DCA 1981). See, also, Lacore v. Giralda Bake Shop, Inc., 407 So.2d 275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Williams’ inaction, like Steinberg’s, was not legally excusable. We therefore affirm.

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lacore v. Giralda Bake Shop, Inc.
407 So. 2d 275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Sternberg v. Barnett Bank of Fort Lauderdale
400 So. 2d 200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
421 So. 2d 193, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-feuer-fladistctapp-1982.