Williams v. Felts
This text of Williams v. Felts (Williams v. Felts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7168
JOSEPH WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CHARLES T. FELTS,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Thomas E. Johnston, District Judge. (5:06-cv-01043)
Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 17, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Joseph Williams, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Williams v. Felts, No. 5:06-cv-01043
(S.D.W. Va. June 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Williams v. Felts, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-felts-ca4-2008.