Williams v. Englebrecht

Ohio Supreme Court

Williams v. Englebrecht

38 Ohio St. (N.S.) 96

DecidedJanuary 15, 1882

StatusPublished

This text of 38 Ohio St. (N.S.) 96 (Williams v. Englebrecht) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Englebrecht, 38 Ohio St. (N.S.) 96 (Ohio 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

Notwithstanding the death of the plaintiff in error after the assignment of errors and before final judgment, the judgment of reversal is valid and effective. By relation, the judgment of reversal takes effect as of the date of the commencement of the proceedings in error.

True, the original action must be revived before a new trial can be had in the court below; but such revivor may be had in the court to which the cause has been remanded for a new trial. See Block v. Hill, 29 Ohio St. 86, and Foresman v. Haag, 37 Ohio St. 143.

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

Notwithstanding the death of the plaintiff in error after the assignment of errors and before final judgment, the judgment of reversal is valid and effective. By relation, the judgment of reversal takes effect as of the date of the commencement of the proceedings in error.

True, the original action must be revived before a new trial can be had in the court below; but such revivor may be had in the court to which the cause has been remanded for a new trial. See Block v. Hill, 29 Ohio St. 86, and Foresman v. Haag, 37 Ohio St. 143.

Motion overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 Ohio St. (N.S.) 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-englebrecht-ohio-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack