Williams v. Empire Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Williams v. Empire Life Insurance

91 S.E. 44, 146 Ga. 246, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 687

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 12, 1916·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Beck, J.

(After stating the facts.) The instant case is not identical in its facts with the case of Reese v. Fidelity Mutual Life Association, 111 Ga. 482 (36 S. E. 637). But upon the controlling question it is very similar to that case, and we are of the opinion that the ruling there made is controlling here. The reasoning upon which that ruling is based, and which is entirely applicable to the facts of the present case, is sound and supported by the authorities adduced to support the conclusions reached.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, J.

(After stating the facts.) The instant case is not identical in its facts with the case of Reese v. Fidelity Mutual Life Association, 111 Ga. 482 (36 S. E. 637). But upon the controlling question it is very similar to that case, and we are of the opinion that the ruling there made is controlling here. The reasoning upon which that ruling is based, and which is entirely applicable to the facts of the present case, is sound and supported by the authorities adduced to support the conclusions reached.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Williams v. Empire Life Insurance, 91 S.E. 44, 146 Ga. 246, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 687 (Ga. 1916).

Pincite

91 S.E. 44 (Williams v. Empire Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related