Williams v. Eason

Fourth Circuit

Williams v. Eason

582 F. App'x 225

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 26, 2014

DocketNo. 14-6684

StatusPublished

This text of 582 F. App'x 225 (Williams v. Eason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Eason, 582 F. App'x 225 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gary Buterra Williams appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Eason, No. 3:13-cv-00493-HEH, 2014 WL 851994 (E.D.Va. Apr. 30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [226]*226court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Gary Buterra Williams appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Eason, No. 3:13-cv-00493-HEH, 2014 WL 851994 (E.D.Va. Apr. 30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [226]*226court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

582 F. App'x 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-eason-ca4-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack