Williams v. Eason
Opinion
Gary Buterra Williams appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Eason, No. 3:13-cv-00493-HEH, 2014 WL 851994 (E.D.Va. Apr. 30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [226] court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
582 F. App'x 225 (Williams v. Eason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.