Williams v. Eagle Brands, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Williams v. Eagle Brands, Inc.

755 So. 2d 780, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4262, 2000 WL 368512

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 12, 2000

DocketNo. 3D98-3295

StatusPublished

This text of 755 So. 2d 780 (Williams v. Eagle Brands, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Eagle Brands, Inc., 755 So. 2d 780, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4262, 2000 WL 368512 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Darlene Williams, plaintiff below, appeals a defense verdict in her lawsuit for damages occasioned by the collision of her automobile with a truck owned by defendant-appellee, Eagle Brands, Inc. Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred by .giving a jury instruction regarding a driver’s obligation to yield the right-of-way where there is a yield sign, as set forth in subsection 316.123(3), Florida Statutes. We conclude that the evidence in the case sufficiently supported the giving of the instruction and affirm the final judgment under review. See Sotuyo v. Williams, 587 So.2d 612, 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Darlene Williams, plaintiff below, appeals a defense verdict in her lawsuit for damages occasioned by the collision of her automobile with a truck owned by defendant-appellee, Eagle Brands, Inc. Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred by .giving a jury instruction regarding a driver’s obligation to yield the right-of-way where there is a yield sign, as set forth in subsection 316.123(3), Florida Statutes. We conclude that the evidence in the case sufficiently supported the giving of the instruction and affirm the final judgment under review. See Sotuyo v. Williams, 587 So.2d 612, 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

755 So. 2d 780, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4262, 2000 WL 368512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-eagle-brands-inc-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack