Williams v. Eagle Brands, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Williams v. Eagle Brands, Inc.

755 So. 2d 780, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4262, 2000 WL 368512

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 12, 2000·No. No. 3D98-3295·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Darlene Williams, plaintiff below, appeals a defense verdict in her lawsuit for damages occasioned by the collision of her automobile with a truck owned by defendant-appellee, Eagle Brands, Inc. Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred by .giving a jury instruction regarding a driver’s obligation to yield the right-of-way where there is a yield sign, as set forth in subsection 316.123(3), Florida Statutes. We conclude that the evidence in the case sufficiently supported the giving of the instruction and affirm the final judgment under review. See Sotuyo v. Williams, 587 So.2d 612, 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Darlene Williams, plaintiff below, appeals a defense verdict in her lawsuit for damages occasioned by the collision of her automobile with a truck owned by defendant-appellee, Eagle Brands, Inc. Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred by .giving a jury instruction regarding a driver’s obligation to yield the right-of-way where there is a yield sign, as set forth in subsection 316.123(3), Florida Statutes. We conclude that the evidence in the case sufficiently supported the giving of the instruction and affirm the final judgment under review. See Sotuyo v. Williams, 587 So.2d 612, 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

Affirmed.

Williams v. Eagle Brands, Inc., 755 So. 2d 780, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4262, 2000 WL 368512 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

755 So. 2d 780 (Williams v. Eagle Brands, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related