Williams v. Division of Highways

18 Ct. Cl. 157
CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims
DecidedApril 11, 1991
DocketCC-90-268
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 Ct. Cl. 157 (Williams v. Division of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Division of Highways, 18 Ct. Cl. 157 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Claimant brought this action to recover damage to his 1988 Ford Escort GT when the vehicle’s tire went into a drop inlet on Route 14 in Parkersburg, Wood County, on June 7, 1990. Claimant alleges that the drop inlet was six to six and one-half inches below the road surface. It ,was located in the middle of his lane of travel. The incident occurred between 3:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on a sunny day. Claimant replaced the damaged tire at a cost of $98.57.

PaulF. Reese, respondent’s maintenance superintendent for Wood County, testified that the drop inlet is maintained by respondent. He stated that the depth of the drop inlet is “maybe a little bit less than three inches” and that this depth is accepted as being safe.

[158]*158The Court is of the opinion that the drop inlet which is the subject matter of this claim did not pose a hazard to the travelers on the road. As claimant failed to establish negligence on the part of the respondent, the Court must deny this claim.

Claim disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rockingham v. . Hood, Comr.
169 S.E. 191 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Ct. Cl. 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-division-of-highways-wvctcl-1991.