Williams v. Division of Highways

18 Ct. Cl. 157
West Virginia Court of Claims·Decided April 11, 1991·No. CC-90-268·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Claimant brought this action to recover damage to his 1988 Ford Escort GT when the vehicle’s tire went into a drop inlet on Route 14 in Parkersburg, Wood County, on June 7, 1990. Claimant alleges that the drop inlet was six to six and one-half inches below the road surface. It ,was located in the middle of his lane of travel. The incident occurred between 3:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on a sunny day. Claimant replaced the damaged tire at a cost of $98.57.

PaulF. Reese, respondent’s maintenance superintendent for Wood County, testified that the drop inlet is maintained by respondent. He stated that the depth of the drop inlet is “maybe a little bit less than three inches” and that this depth is accepted as being safe.

[158] The Court is of the opinion that the drop inlet which is the subject matter of this claim did not pose a hazard to the travelers on the road. As claimant failed to establish negligence on the part of the respondent, the Court must deny this claim.

Claim disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Division of Highways, 18 Ct. Cl. 157 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1991).

18 Ct. Cl. 157 (Williams v. Division of Highways) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rockingham v. . Hood, Comr.
169 S.E. 191 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)