Williams v. District Grand Lodge No. 21

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Williams v. District Grand Lodge No. 21

192 So. 895

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJanuary 9, 1940

DocketNo. 17244.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 192 So. 895 (Williams v. District Grand Lodge No. 21) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. District Grand Lodge No. 21, 192 So. 895 (La. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Our attention has been called to the fact that in affirming the judgment of the lower court we inadvertently allowed six percent per annum interest from the date of the death of the insured as would have been authorized as a penalty under Act No. 17 of 1920. Counsel for all parties concede that this act has no application. The interest^ therefore, will be changed from six percent per annum to five percent per annum, the legal rate, and will run from judicial demand. Our decree is amended accordingly.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Our attention has been called to the fact that in affirming the judgment of the lower court we inadvertently allowed six percent per annum interest from the date of the death of the insured as would have been authorized as a penalty under Act No. 17 of 1920. Counsel for all parties concede that this act has no application. The interest^ therefore, will be changed from six percent per annum to five percent per annum, the legal rate, and will run from judicial demand. Our decree is amended accordingly.

Rehearing refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 So. 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-district-grand-lodge-no-21-lactapp-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack