Williams v. Director of Patuxent Institution
This text of 192 A.2d 785 (Williams v. Director of Patuxent Institution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this application for leave to appeal a finding by the Criminal Court of Baltimore that he was a defective delinquent within the meaning of Code (1957), Art. 31B, Sec. 5, the applicant, Lester E. Williams, alleges that: (1) the defective delinquent statute, Code (1957), Art. 31B, is “arbitrary and oppressive,” “an attempt to subvert the United States Constitution” and an ex post facto law, and therefore unconstitutional; (2) he was placed in double jeopardy by the finding of defective delinquency; and (3) he does not fit the description of a defective delinquent.
The first two contentions both were raised and rejected in McDonough v. Director, 229 Md. 626; Simmons v. Director, 227 Md. 661; and Eggleston v. State, 209 Md. 504.
The answer to the third contention is that the staff of the [633]*633Patuxent Institution and an independent psychiatrist of applicant’s own choice (appointed in accordance with Code (1957), Art. 31B, Sec. 7 (b)), found the applicant to be a defective delinquent under the statutory tests.
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
192 A.2d 785, 232 Md. 632, 1963 Md. LEXIS 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-director-of-patuxent-institution-md-1963.