Williams v. D&H Contracting Inc
This text of Williams v. D&H Contracting Inc (Williams v. D&H Contracting Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
TREVOR WILLIAMS, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated PLAINTIFF
Vv. No. 3:23-cv-31-DPM
D&H CONTRACTING, INC. DEFENDANT
ORDER The joint status report, Doc. 23, is noted and appreciated. The joint motion, Doc. 21, is granted. The proposed settlement—as modified, Doc. 23 at 1—is fair, reasonable, and adequate. Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982); see also Barbee v. Big River Steel, LLC, 927 F.3d 1024, 2027 (8th Cir. 2019); Melgar v. OK Foods, 902 F.3d 775, 779 (8th Cir. 2018). It reflects a good-faith compromise of the parties’ wage-related dispute. And the parties negotiated the attorney’s fees and costs separately. Barbee, 927 F.3d at 1027. Plus those fees related to all claims. The complaint will be dismissed with prejudice. So Ordered.
pstel Z D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge is Sep totter A0aAN
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Williams v. D&H Contracting Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-dh-contracting-inc-ared-2024.