Williams v. Department of Education

West Virginia Court of Claims

Williams v. Department of Education

7 Ct. Cl. 103

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedMay 24, 1968

DocketNo. D-26

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Ct. Cl. 103 (Williams v. Department of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Department of Education, 7 Ct. Cl. 103 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Ducker, Judge:

The claimant, Patrick C. Williams, Jr., M. D., states that at the request of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation of the Department of Education of the State of West Virginia, he gave a medical consultation at Charleston Memorial Hospital on October 10, 1965 and made hospital visits at Charleston General Hospital on November 8, 9, 10 and 11, 1965 to one Norma Board, a client of the Rehabilitation Center, for which services he claims the sum of $24.00.

The Director of the Vocational Rehabilitation Division and the Attorney General have answered the petition stating that the claim was correct, that it was not paid by reason of error and the amount is just and due the claimant.

Wherefore, this Court is of the opinion that the claim is just and should be paid, and, accordingly, we award the claimant the sum of $24.00.

Claim awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ducker, Judge:

The claimant, Patrick C. Williams, Jr., M. D., states that at the request of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation of the Department of Education of the State of West Virginia, he gave a medical consultation at Charleston Memorial Hospital on October 10, 1965 and made hospital visits at Charleston General Hospital on November 8, 9, 10 and 11, 1965 to one Norma Board, a client of the Rehabilitation Center, for which services he claims the sum of $24.00.

The Director of the Vocational Rehabilitation Division and the Attorney General have answered the petition stating that the claim was correct, that it was not paid by reason of error and the amount is just and due the claimant.

Wherefore, this Court is of the opinion that the claim is just and should be paid, and, accordingly, we award the claimant the sum of $24.00.

Claim awarded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Ct. Cl. 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-department-of-education-wvctcl-1968.