Williams v. Department of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Williams v. Department of Corrections

161 So. 3d 512, 2014 WL 3871249, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12144

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 8, 2014

DocketNo. 5D13-4308

StatusPublished

This text of 161 So. 3d 512 (Williams v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Department of Corrections, 161 So. 3d 512, 2014 WL 3871249, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12144 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Bracey v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 764 So.2d 905, 905 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (“PERC was required to affirm the factual findings ... made by the hearing officer if such findings are' supported by competent substantial evidence.”); Crawley v. Dep’t of Highway [513]*513Safety & Motor Vehicles, 616 So.2d 1061, 1063 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (“The determination of whether appellant’s violation of policy was willful is a factual determination to be made by the hearing officer. PERC may not reject the hearing officer’s finding unless there is no competent, substantial evidence from which the finding could reasonably be inferred.”).

ORFINGER, LAWSON, JJ„ and HARRIS, C.M., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Bracey v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 764 So.2d 905, 905 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (“PERC was required to affirm the factual findings ... made by the hearing officer if such findings are' supported by competent substantial evidence.”); Crawley v. Dep’t of Highway [513]*513Safety & Motor Vehicles, 616 So.2d 1061, 1063 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (“The determination of whether appellant’s violation of policy was willful is a factual determination to be made by the hearing officer. PERC may not reject the hearing officer’s finding unless there is no competent, substantial evidence from which the finding could reasonably be inferred.”).

ORFINGER, LAWSON, JJ„ and HARRIS, C.M., Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 So. 3d 512, 2014 WL 3871249, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack