Williams v. Department of Corrections

161 So. 3d 512, 2014 WL 3871249, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12144
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. Department of Corrections. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 809
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 8, 2014·No. No. 5D13-4308·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Bracey v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 764 So.2d 905, 905 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (“PERC was required to affirm the factual findings ... made by the hearing officer if such findings are' supported by competent substantial evidence.”); Crawley v. Dep’t of Highway [513]*513Safety & Motor Vehicles, 616 So.2d 1061, 1063 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (“The determination of whether appellant’s violation of policy was willful is a factual determination to be made by the hearing officer. PERC may not reject the hearing officer’s finding unless there is no competent, substantial evidence from which the finding could reasonably be inferred.”).

ORFINGER, LAWSON, JJ„ and HARRIS, C.M., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Department of Corrections, 161 So. 3d 512, 2014 WL 3871249, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12144 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

161 So. 3d 512 (Williams v. Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crawley v. DEPT. OF HWY. SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES
616 So. 2d 1061 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Bracey v. Department of Children & Families
764 So. 2d 905 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)