Williams v. Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Williams v. Department of Corrections

643 F. App'x 260

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 1, 2016·No. No. 15-7986·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rodney McDonald Williams, Jr., appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing his action with prejudice. We dismiss the appeal as duplicative because we dismissed as frivolous his prior appeal from the same order and judgment. See Williams v. Dep’t of Corr., 622 Fed.Appx. 310 (4th Cir.2015) (No. 15-7034). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal as duplica-tive. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[261] fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rodney McDonald Williams, Jr., appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing his action with prejudice. We dismiss the appeal as duplicative because we dismissed as frivolous his prior appeal from the same order and judgment. See Williams v. Dep’t of Corr., 622 Fed.Appx. 310 (4th Cir.2015) (No. 15-7034). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal as duplica-tive. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[261] fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Williams v. Department of Corrections, 643 F. App'x 260 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

643 F. App'x 260 (Williams v. Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related