Williams v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

683 So. 2d 670, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12778, 1996 WL 697262
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 6, 1996
DocketNo. 96-457
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 683 So. 2d 670 (Williams v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation, 683 So. 2d 670, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12778, 1996 WL 697262 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

We reverse the final order of the Florida Real Estate Commission and remand for entry of a proper order, containing specific findings of fact and conclusions of law. The appellant licensee was subject to discipline under section 475.25(l)(m), Florida Statutes for misrepresenting, in connection with his license renewal application, that he had satisfied the continuing education requirement. See § 475.182, Florida Statutes. However, the final order here fails to comply with the dictates of section 120.59(l)(a), Florida Statutes, which requires that final orders “be in writing and include findings of fact and conclusions of law separately stated....”

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

W. SHARP and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. FLORIDA DEPT. OF BUSINESS
705 So. 2d 652 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
683 So. 2d 670, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12778, 1996 WL 697262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-department-of-business-professional-regulation-fladistctapp-1996.