Williams v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

683 So. 2d 670, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12778, 1996 WL 697262
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 6, 1996·No. No. 96-457·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

We reverse the final order of the Florida Real Estate Commission and remand for entry of a proper order, containing specific findings of fact and conclusions of law. The appellant licensee was subject to discipline under section 475.25(l)(m), Florida Statutes for misrepresenting, in connection with his license renewal application, that he had satisfied the continuing education requirement. See § 475.182, Florida Statutes. However, the final order here fails to comply with the dictates of section 120.59(l)(a), Florida Statutes, which requires that final orders “be in writing and include findings of fact and conclusions of law separately stated....”

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

W. SHARP and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation, 683 So. 2d 670, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12778, 1996 WL 697262 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

683 So. 2d 670 (Williams v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. FLORIDA DEPT. OF BUSINESS
705 So. 2d 652 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)