Williams v. Dempsey

131 N.E.2d 469, 235 Ind. 695, 1956 Ind. LEXIS 211
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided January 24, 1956·No. No. 0-417·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petitioner seeks an alternative writ of mandamus directed to respondent judge. The action is not prosecuted in the name of the State of Indiana on the relation of [696]*696the party seeking relief, and this requirement is mandatory. Nor does the petition comply with Rule 2-35 as to certified copies of the pleadings, orders and entries in the trial court.

Petition denied.

Note. — Reported in 131 N. E. 2d 469.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Dempsey, 131 N.E.2d 469, 235 Ind. 695, 1956 Ind. LEXIS 211 (Ind. 1956).

131 N.E.2d 469 (Williams v. Dempsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Evansville American Legion Home Ass'n v. White
230 N.E.2d 623 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1967)
Hutter v. Weiss
177 N.E.2d 339 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1961)
Kielczewski v. Rochwalik
130 N.E.2d 785 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1955)