Williams v. Dempsey

Indiana Supreme Court

Williams v. Dempsey

131 N.E.2d 469, 235 Ind. 695, 1956 Ind. LEXIS 211

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 24, 1956

DocketNo. 0-417

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 131 N.E.2d 469 (Williams v. Dempsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Dempsey, 131 N.E.2d 469, 235 Ind. 695, 1956 Ind. LEXIS 211 (Ind. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petitioner seeks an alternative writ of mandamus directed to respondent judge. The action is not prosecuted in the name of the State of Indiana on the relation of [696]*696the party seeking relief, and this requirement is mandatory. Nor does the petition comply with Rule 2-35 as to certified copies of the pleadings, orders and entries in the trial court.

Petition denied.

Note. — Reported in 131 N. E. 2d 469.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petitioner seeks an alternative writ of mandamus directed to respondent judge. The action is not prosecuted in the name of the State of Indiana on the relation of [696]*696the party seeking relief, and this requirement is mandatory. Nor does the petition comply with Rule 2-35 as to certified copies of the pleadings, orders and entries in the trial court.

Petition denied.

Note. — Reported in 131 N. E. 2d 469.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 N.E.2d 469, 235 Ind. 695, 1956 Ind. LEXIS 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-dempsey-ind-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack