Williams v. Davis
91 S.E. 283, 19 Ga. App. 263, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 89
This text of 91 S.E. 283 (Williams v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Williams v. Davis, 91 S.E. 283, 19 Ga. App. 263, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 89 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).
Opinion
1. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.
2. The grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, not being referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
91 S.E. 283, 19 Ga. App. 263, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-davis-gactapp-1917.