Williams v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit
256 F.3d 260, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 14241, 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,671, 86 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 222, 2001 WL 716949
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 26, 2001·No. 00-10361·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Treating the. petition for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor (see Fed. R.App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit, 256 F.3d 260, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 14241, 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,671, 86 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 222, 2001 WL 716949 (5th Cir. 2001).
256 F.3d 260 (Williams v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Santillana
109 F. App'x 665 (Fifth Circuit, 2004)
Dresser, Inc. v. Lowry
320 F. Supp. 2d 486 (W.D. Louisiana, 2004)
Patricia Hart v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
266 F.3d 1155 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)