Williams v. Crowley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Williams v. Crowley

174 S.E. 219, 48 Ga. App. 841, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 220

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 29, 1934

Docket23584

StatusPublished

This text of 174 S.E. 219 (Williams v. Crowley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Crowley, 174 S.E. 219, 48 Ga. App. 841, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 220 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Special grounds 4 and 5 of the motion for a new trial, complaining of the failure of the court to charge properly the contentions of the defendant, are expressly disapproved by the trial court, and therefore can not be considered by this court.

2. Hone of the several excerpts from the charge of the court, complained of, when considered in the light of the charge as a whole, the facts of the case, and the law pertinent thereto, is erroneous for any reason assigned.

3. The evidence, while in sharp conflict upon the material issues of fact, authorized the verdict for the plaintiff, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI