Williams v. County of Sacramento

District Court, E.D. California·Decided June 30, 2021·No. 2:20-cv-00598·Unknown

Opinion

Lawrance A. Bohm (SBN: 208716) 1 lbohm@bohmlaw.com 2 Daniel T. Newman (SBN: 314937) dnewman@bohmlaw.com 3 Scott C. Zienty (SBN: 324661) szienty@bohmlaw.com 4 BOHM LAW GROUP, INC. 5 4600 Northgate Boulevard, Suite 210 Sacramento, California 95834 6 Telephone: 866.920.1292 Facsimile: 916.927.2046 7 Gregory R. Davenport (SBN: 154403) 8 grdatlaw@aol.com 3439 Brookside Road, Suite 205 10 Stockton, California 95219 Telephone: 209.955.1999 11 Facsimile: 209.475.4951 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Thomas Williams 13

14 Van Longyear (SBN: 84189) Carl L. Fessenden (SBN: 161494) longyear@longyearlaw.com cfessenden@porterscott.com 15 Nicole M. Cahill (SBN: 287165) John R. Whitefleet (SBN: 213301) cahill@longyearlaw.com jwhitefleet@porterscott.com 16 LONGYEAR & LAVRA, LLP PORTER SCOTT 17 3620 American River Drive, Suite 230 350 University Avenue, Ste. 200 Sacramento, CA 95864 Sacramento, CA 95825 18 Telephone: 916.974.8500 Telephone: 916.929.1481 Facsimile: 916.974.8510 Facsimile: 916.927.3706 19 Attorneys for Defendant, Attorneys for Defendant 20 County of Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova; Nathan Daniel; 21 Joseph Zalec; and Derek Hutchins UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 22 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 23 THOMAS WILLIAMS, Case No.: 2:20-cv-00598-TLN-KJN 24

Plaintiff, 25 v. [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 26 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; CITY OF STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RANCHO CORDOVA; NATHAN DANIEL; 27 JOSEPH ZALEC; DEREK HUTCHINS; and Action Filed: March 18, 2020 28 DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Trial Date: Not Set Defendants. ] The court APPROVES the parties’ stipulated protective order (ECF No. 21) subject to 2 || the following clarification. Once this action is closed, “unless otherwise ordered, the court will 3 || not retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of” this protective order. E.D. Cal. 4 ||/R. 141.1(f). Courts in the district generally do not agree to retain jurisdiction after closure of 5 || the case. See, e.g., MD Helicopters, Inc. v. Aerometals, Inc., 2017 WL 495778 (E.D. Cal., 6 || Feb. 3, 2017). 8 || Dated: June 30, 2021 Foci) Aharon UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

{Prepesed} Order Regarding Stipulated Protective Order

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. County of Sacramento, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Williams v. County of Sacramento (Williams v. County of Sacramento) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.