Williams v. Coughlin

147 A.D.2d 487, 538 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1489
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. Coughlin. Read the opinion of the Court — 145 A.D.2d 771

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondents to credit the petitioner with certain jail time, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Martin, J.), dated April 23, 1986, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the petitioner’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Rubin, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Coughlin, 147 A.D.2d 487, 538 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1489 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

147 A.D.2d 487 (Williams v. Coughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)