Williams v. Corizon Medical Service

Fourth Circuit

Williams v. Corizon Medical Service

549 F. App'x 178

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 24, 2013·No. No. 13-7546·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Williams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Williams’ motions for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Corizon Med. Serv., No. 8:12-cv-02121-DKC, 2013 WL 4541684 (D.Md. Aug. 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Williams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Williams’ motions for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Corizon Med. Serv., No. 8:12-cv-02121-DKC, 2013 WL 4541684 (D.Md. Aug. 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Williams v. Corizon Medical Service, 549 F. App'x 178 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

549 F. App'x 178 (Williams v. Corizon Medical Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related