Williams v. Coosa Manufacturing Co.

138 Ala. 673
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 15, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 138 Ala. 673 (Williams v. Coosa Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Coosa Manufacturing Co., 138 Ala. 673 (Ala. 1903).

Opinion

Opinion by

Sharpe, J.

This action was brought by the appellant; Lon Williams, against the Coosa Manufacturing Company, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff by reason of the alleged negligence of the defendant. There were demurrers interposed to the complaint. These demurrers were sustained, and the plaintiff declining to plead further, judgment was rendered for the defendant. The assignment of error in the case ivas as follows: “Comes the plaintiff, and for assignment of error says that the court erred in sustaining demurrers, and each of them, to plaintiff’s complaint from 1 to 12, inclusive, set out on pages 7 and 8 of record.”

It is held by the court that this assignment of error was too general to be considered, and that it does not conform to Bule 1 of Supreme Court Practice.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hicks v. Allred
204 So. 2d 813 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1967)
Middleton v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.
153 So. 256 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1934)
Hale v. Cox
131 So. 233 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1930)
Alabama Chemical Co. v. Hall
101 So. 456 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)
Jackson v. Ariton Banking Co.
108 So. 359 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)
Globe Rutgers Fire Ins. Co. v. Jones
106 So. 172 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)
Ex Parte Mobile Light R. Co.
78 So. 399 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1918)
Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. Crosby
70 So. 7 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1915)
Smith v. State
69 So. 406 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)
Southern Railway Co. v. Foster
60 So. 993 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)
Craig & Co. v. Pierson Lumber Co.
53 So. 803 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1910)
Climax Lumber Co. v. Bay City Mach. Wks.
50 So. 935 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1909)
North Birmingham Lumber Co. v. Sims & White
48 So. 84 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1908)
Southern Railway Co. v. Nowlin
47 So. 180 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1908)
Southern Railway Co. v. Kirsch
43 So. 796 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1907)
Birmingham Ry. Light & Power Co. v. Moore
42 So. 1024 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1906)
Ferrell v. City of Opelika
39 So. 249 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 Ala. 673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-coosa-manufacturing-co-ala-1903.