Williams v. Conwell

Indiana Supreme Court

Williams v. Conwell

19 Ind. 27

DecidedNovember 15, 1862

StatusPublished

This text of 19 Ind. 27 (Williams v. Conwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Conwell, 19 Ind. 27 (Ind. 1862).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case no exception, in any form, appears to have been taken to the rulings of the lower [28]*28Court, nor was there any motion for a new trial or in arrest. And moreover, in looking into the record, we perceive no error.

W. S. Ballinger and JD. M. Bradbury, for the appellants. J. B. and J. F. Julian, for the appellee.

The judgment is affirmed, with two per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this case no exception, in any form, appears to have been taken to the rulings of the lower [28]*28Court, nor was there any motion for a new trial or in arrest. And moreover, in looking into the record, we perceive no error.

W. S. Ballinger and JD. M. Bradbury, for the appellants. J. B. and J. F. Julian, for the appellee.

The judgment is affirmed, with two per cent, damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Ind. 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-conwell-ind-1862.