Williams v. Commonwealth

34 Pa. 178
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 1, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 34 Pa. 178 (Williams v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Commonwealth, 34 Pa. 178 (Pa. 1859).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lowrie, C. J.

Cheating or defrauding by means of any false token or writing, or by any false pretences whatsoever, is punishable by imprisonment, in the penitentiary or the county jail, not exceeding one year; and conspiracy to cheat in that way cannot be more severely punished: Act 12th July 1842, § 21; 5 Barr 60.

We regard the sixth count of this indictment as charging a conspiracy to cheat a given person by false tokens or writings, that is, by counterfeit bank notes; and though this could formerly be punished more severely than above indicated, 3 S. & R. 220, it cannot now. ' We cannot treat it as charging a conspiracy to make and pass counterfeit notes: 4 Barr 210.

We must, therefore, correct the sentence passed in this case.

The sentence of the Quarter Sessions is reversed for all the term of imprisonment of the defendant beyond the term of one year and affirmed for the residue, and the record is remitted to the Quarter Sessions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Haun
27 Pa. Super. 33 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Pa. 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-commonwealth-pa-1859.