Williams v. Commonwealth
398 S.W.2d 503
This text of 398 S.W.2d 503 (Williams v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Williams v. Commonwealth, 398 S.W.2d 503 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966).
Opinion
In his motion under RCr 11.42, the .appellant alleges he was denied a continuance at his trial for various reasons. The record shows he was represented-by counsel and that no motion or request for a continuance was made.
Relief was properly denied.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
398 S.W.2d 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1966.