Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SELINAWILLIAMS. SSS
Plaintiff, 19 CIVIL 9108 (NSR) (AEK) -v- JUDGMENT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ween eK It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED): That for the reasons stated in the Court's Stipulation and Order dated June 10, 2021, that this action be, and hereby is, remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), in connection with the Supreme Court’s decision in Carr v. Saul, 141 S. Ct. 1352 (2021), in which the Court held that a claimant need not raise an Appointments Clause claim before the Social Security Administration, but may instead present it for the first time in federal court. On remand, the case will be assigned to a different administrative law judge (“ALJ”) to further evaluate plaintiff's claims, plaintiff will be offered the opportunity for a hearing, and the ALJ will issue a new decision.
Dated: New York, New York June 10, 2021
RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of / BY: D Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security (Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.