Williams v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
746 A.2d 794, 252 Conn. 930, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 64
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedFebruary 16, 2000
DocketSC 16249
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 746 A.2d 794 (Williams v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Williams v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 746 A.2d 794, 252 Conn. 930, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 64 (Colo. 2000).
Opinion
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 251 (AC 17948), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court improperly conclude that the 180 day time limitation for filing a complaint under General Statutes § 46a-82 (e) was subject matter jurisdictional?”
KATZ and VERTEFEUILLE, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Williams v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
786 A.2d 1283 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2001)
Williams v. Commission On Human Rights & Opportunities
777 A.2d 645 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
746 A.2d 794, 252 Conn. 930, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-commission-on-human-rights-opportunities-conn-2000.