Williams v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
746 A.2d 794, 252 Conn. 930, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 64
Opinion
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 251 (AC 17948), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court improperly conclude that the 180 day time limitation for filing a complaint under General Statutes § 46a-82 (e) was subject matter jurisdictional?”
KATZ and VERTEFEUILLE, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 746 A.2d 794, 252 Conn. 930, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 64 (Colo. 2000).
746 A.2d 794 (Williams v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
786 A.2d 1283 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2001)
Williams v. Commission On Human Rights & Opportunities
777 A.2d 645 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)