Williams v. Colvin

Fourth Circuit

Williams v. Colvin

669 F. App'x 677

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2016·No. No. 16-1471·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cindy S. Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the- magistrate judge’s recommendation and affirming the Commissioner’s denial of supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Colvin, No. 3:15-cv-00163-MHL (E.D. Va. Feb. 26, 2016). We further deny Williams’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cindy S. Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the- magistrate judge’s recommendation and affirming the Commissioner’s denial of supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Colvin, No. 3:15-cv-00163-MHL (E.D. Va. Feb. 26, 2016). We further deny Williams’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Williams v. Colvin, 669 F. App'x 677 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

669 F. App'x 677 (Williams v. Colvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.