Williams v. City of Troy
715 N.W.2d 883, 475 Mich. 885
This text of 715 N.W.2d 883 (Williams v. City of Troy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Williams v. City of Troy, 715 N.W.2d 883, 475 Mich. 885 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Robert J. WILLIAMS, Karla Williams, Matthew Goodman, Amy Goodman, Thomas Foot, Jacqueline Foot, William Bigelow, Margo Bigelow, Carl Qualmann, Marge Qualmann, Calvin Robertson, Virginia Robertson, Roger Howard, Nancy Howard, John F. Mills, and Kathleen A. Mills, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF TROY and Ken Freund, d/b/a Freund & Associates, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
715 N.W.2d 883, 475 Mich. 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-city-of-troy-mich-2006.