Williams v. City of St. Louis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Williams v. City of St. Louis

344 S.W.3d 302, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1028, 2011 WL 3444204

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 9, 2011·No. WD 73371·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Edgar Williams appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found that Williams was discharged for misconduct connected with work and was, therefore, disqualified for unemployment compensation benefits. On appeal, Williams claims that the Commission erred in finding that he was discharged for misconduct because the Commission misapplied the law and its findings were not supported by competent and substantial evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Edgar Williams appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found that Williams was discharged for misconduct connected with work and was, therefore, disqualified for unemployment compensation benefits. On appeal, Williams claims that the Commission erred in finding that he was discharged for misconduct because the Commission misapplied the law and its findings were not supported by competent and substantial evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). ■

Williams v. City of St. Louis, 344 S.W.3d 302, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1028, 2011 WL 3444204 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

344 S.W.3d 302 (Williams v. City of St. Louis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related