Williams v. City of St. Louis

344 S.W.3d 302, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1028, 2011 WL 3444204
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 9, 2011
DocketWD 73371
StatusPublished

This text of 344 S.W.3d 302 (Williams v. City of St. Louis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. City of St. Louis, 344 S.W.3d 302, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1028, 2011 WL 3444204 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Edgar Williams appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found that Williams was discharged for misconduct connected with work and was, therefore, disqualified for unemployment compensation benefits. On appeal, Williams claims that the Commission erred in finding that he was discharged for misconduct because the Commission misapplied the law and its findings were not supported by competent and substantial evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Kw
344 S.W.3d 302 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
344 S.W.3d 302, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1028, 2011 WL 3444204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-city-of-st-louis-moctapp-2011.