Williams v. City of Richmond

169 F. App'x 157
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2006·No. No. 05-7313·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gary Buterra Williams appeals the district court’s order denying relief without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v. City of Richmond, No. CA-04-747-3 (E.D.Va. Aug. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. City of Richmond, 169 F. App'x 157 (4th Cir. 2006).

169 F. App'x 157 (Williams v. City of Richmond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)