Home/California Court of Appeal/Williams v. City of Piedmont

Williams v. City of Piedmont

281 P. 79, 100 Cal. App. 802, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 393
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedSeptember 24, 1929
DocketCiv. No. 6848
StatusPublished

This text of 281 P. 79 (Williams v. City of Piedmont) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. City of Piedmont, 281 P. 79, 100 Cal. App. 802, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 393 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

STURTEVANT, J.

From each of three declaratory judgments the defendant has áppealed. In each case the point is made that the trial court had no jurisdiction to determine the validity of Ordinance No. 268 of the City of Piedmont. On the authority of Andrews v. City of Piedmont (No. 6624), ante, p. 700 [281 Pac. 78], this day filed, the point may not be sustained. In the view we take of the record it is unnecessary to discuss either of the other two points made by the defendant.

Each of the judgments is affirmed.

Koford, P. J., and Nourse, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Andrews v. City of Piedmont
281 P. 78 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 P. 79, 100 Cal. App. 802, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-city-of-piedmont-calctapp-1929.