Williams v. City of New York

109 A.D.3d 744, 971 N.Y.S.2d 442
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 26, 2013·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Diane A. Lebedeff, J.), entered August 18, 2010, which denied [745]*745plaintiffs CPLR 4404 (a) motion to set aside the jury’s verdict in this case alleging intentional tort, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly determined that the jury’s verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see Lolik v Big V Supermarkets, 86 NY2d 744, 746 [1995]). The testimony of plaintiff and defendant’s witness offered conflicting accounts of the events at issue. The jury weighed the credibility of the witnesses and the evidence and reached its conclusion based on a fair interpretation of the evidence.

We have considered the parties’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Mazzarelli, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. City of New York, 109 A.D.3d 744, 971 N.Y.S.2d 442 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

109 A.D.3d 744 (Williams v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Augustine v. New York City Transit Authority
118 A.D.3d 475 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)