Williams v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Williams v. City of New York

81 A.D.2d 559, 438 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11035

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 81 A.D.2d 559 (Williams v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. City of New York, 81 A.D.2d 559, 438 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11035 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered April 11, 1980, [560]*560awarding plaintiff the sum of $123,693.50, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the matter remanded for a new trial, with costs to abide the event. This action for wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering involves a 14-year-old boy who was shot to death by a New York City police officer in circumstances from which negligence, as alleged, could be inferred. On the other hand, a witness testified that the decedent, after his apprehension, lunged at the police officer with a knife and that the officer, fearful for his life, responded by shooting the decedent. EPTL 5-4.2 and 11-3.2. (subd [b]) provide that in a wrongful death action accruing prior to September 1, 1975, as is the case here, and in a personal injury action joined with such a death action, the contributory negligence of the decedent shall be a defense, to be pleaded and proved by the defendant. Defendant, City of New York, pleaded such a defense. The court, however, in charging the jury, placed on the defendant the burden of proving not only contributory negligence but its lack of negligence as well: “[T]he burden [of proof] is shifted onto the Defendant to prove that not only was he not negligent but the Plaintiff or the deceased in this case was negligent. So the burden here on the question of negligence is shifted entirely pretty much to the Defendant”. While it is true that a plaintiff is not held to as high a degree of proof in a death action (Noseworthy v City of New York, 298 NY 76, 80), the burden of proof is not thereby shifted. Plaintiff must still prove the defendant’s negligence by a fair preponderence of the credible evidence. The court’s instruction to the contrary, to which appropriate exception was taken, constitutes fundamental error which prejudiced defendant. Reversal is mandated. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Sullivan, Silverman and Bloom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered April 11, 1980, [560]*560awarding plaintiff the sum of $123,693.50, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the matter remanded for a new trial, with costs to abide the event. This action for wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering involves a 14-year-old boy who was shot to death by a New York City police officer in circumstances from which negligence, as alleged, could be inferred. On the other hand, a witness testified that the decedent, after his apprehension, lunged at the police officer with a knife and that the officer, fearful for his life, responded by shooting the decedent. EPTL 5-4.2 and 11-3.2. (subd [b]) provide that in a wrongful death action accruing prior to September 1, 1975, as is the case here, and in a personal injury action joined with such a death action, the contributory negligence of the decedent shall be a defense, to be pleaded and proved by the defendant. Defendant, City of New York, pleaded such a defense. The court, however, in charging the jury, placed on the defendant the burden of proving not only contributory negligence but its lack of negligence as well: “[T]he burden [of proof] is shifted onto the Defendant to prove that not only was he not negligent but the Plaintiff or the deceased in this case was negligent. So the burden here on the question of negligence is shifted entirely pretty much to the Defendant”. While it is true that a plaintiff is not held to as high a degree of proof in a death action (Noseworthy v City of New York, 298 NY 76, 80), the burden of proof is not thereby shifted. Plaintiff must still prove the defendant’s negligence by a fair preponderence of the credible evidence. The court’s instruction to the contrary, to which appropriate exception was taken, constitutes fundamental error which prejudiced defendant. Reversal is mandated. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Sullivan, Silverman and Bloom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 A.D.2d 559, 438 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack