Williams v. City of Louisville

120 So. 571, 153 Miss. 48, 1929 Miss. LEXIS 16
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 18, 1929
DocketNo. 27481.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 120 So. 571 (Williams v. City of Louisville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. City of Louisville, 120 So. 571, 153 Miss. 48, 1929 Miss. LEXIS 16 (Mich. 1929).

Opinion

Anderson, J.

We think it was a question for the jury whether or not, under all the facts and circumstances given in evidence, appellant was in possession of the liquor, in the sense of the law. We find no error in the rulings of the court on the evidence, nor in the giving of instructions for appellee.

*49 The court imposed a fine of one hundred and fifty dollars. This was error, because under the ordinances of appellee the maximum fine which the court was authorized to impose was one hundred dollars. For that reason alone the judgment is reversed, and judgment will be entered here, reducing the fine from one hundred and fifty to one hundred dollars.

Affirmed in part, and reversed in part, and judgment here.

Affirmed in part.

Reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Newburn v. State
205 So. 2d 260 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 So. 571, 153 Miss. 48, 1929 Miss. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-city-of-louisville-miss-1929.