Williams v. City Council of Augusta

36 S.E. 607, 111 Ga. 849, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 819
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 9, 1900·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Little, J.

1. The offense of retailing spirituous or malt liquors without license,” though committed upon the Sabbath day, is a violation of a penal statute of this State. Moran v. Atlanta, 102 Ga. 840.

2. Accordingly, the recorder’s court of the City of Augusta has no jurisdiction to try and punish for this offense.

8. Though the plaintiff in error entered in that court a plea of guilty to a charge of the nature above indicated, the recorder had no authority of law to impose a penalty upon him, and it was his right by petition for certiorari to correct the error which the recorder committed in so doing. 4. The court erred in refusing to sanction the petition for certiorari.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. City Council of Augusta, 36 S.E. 607, 111 Ga. 849, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 819 (Ga. 1900).

36 S.E. 607 (Williams v. City Council of Augusta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shuler v. State
54 S.E. 689 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)