Williams v. Circuit Court

Fourth Circuit

Williams v. Circuit Court

583 F. App'x 247

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 26, 2014·No. No. 14-7064·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished.opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gary Buterra Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to amend his motion to reconsider, styled as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, the court’s order remanding his state prosecution to state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished.opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gary Buterra Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to amend his motion to reconsider, styled as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, the court’s order remanding his state prosecution to state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Williams v. Circuit Court, 583 F. App'x 247 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

583 F. App'x 247 (Williams v. Circuit Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related