Williams v. Chrysler Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Williams v. Chrysler Corp.

419 N.W.2d 782, 166 Mich. App. 297

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 2, 1988

DocketDocket No. 88959

StatusPublished

This text of 419 N.W.2d 782 (Williams v. Chrysler Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Chrysler Corp., 419 N.W.2d 782, 166 Mich. App. 297 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

[298]*298AFTER REMAND

Before: Cynar, P.J., and J. H. Gillis and D. F. Walsh, JJ.

Per Curiam.

Following this Court’s remand in

Williams v Chrysler Corp, 159 Mich App 8; 406 NW2d 222 (1987), the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board found that plaintiff had not sustained his burden of proving that the atmospheric conditions at his former place of employment, rather than his cigarette smoking, caused or aggravated his bronchial asthma. Because there was competent evidence to support the wcab’s findings of fact, we affirm. Williams, supra, p 11.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI