Williams v. Cheatham

25 S.E. 698, 99 Ga. 301
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 10, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 25 S.E. 698 (Williams v. Cheatham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Cheatham, 25 S.E. 698, 99 Ga. 301 (Ga. 1896).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

It appearing from the allegations of the plaintiff’s petition as amended that the various matters of which she therein complains against the defendant had been adjudicated against her by a consent judgment rendered in “an equity proceeding” to which both of them were parties, and the declaration not making it, for any reason therein alleged, apparent that this judgment was void, and neither it nor any of the pleadings upon which it was founded being set forth, and all the presumptions of law being in favor of its validity, the petition set forth no cause of action, and the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the same. Judgment rDoersed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

National Life & Accident Insurance v. Leo
178 S.E. 322 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Crowson v. Cody
110 So. 46 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)
Keown v. Hughes
265 F. 572 (First Circuit, 1920)
Hewitt v. Great Western Beet Sugar Co.
230 F. 394 (Ninth Circuit, 1916)
Keen v. Brown
46 Fla. 487 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1903)
Hammond v. Thornton
33 S.E. 183 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 S.E. 698, 99 Ga. 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-cheatham-ga-1896.