Williams v. Chariton County

Supreme Court of Missouri

Williams v. Chariton County

85 Mo. 645

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedApril 15, 1885

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 85 Mo. 645 (Williams v. Chariton County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Chariton County, 85 Mo. 645 (Mo. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Under the authority of the case of Shed v. Ry. Co., 67 Mo. 687, no fees are allowed an officer except where expressly given and allowed by law. Moreover the compensation of assessors, except in St. Louis county, is fixed at a certain sum, and this sum includes all personal property assessed to one owner. Dogs being assessed in the list of personal property makes no increase in the emoluments of the assessor. See section 69, W. S. 1872, p. 1172. Therefore, judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

Under the authority of the case of Shed v. Ry. Co., 67 Mo. 687, no fees are allowed an officer except where expressly given and allowed by law. Moreover the compensation of assessors, except in St. Louis county, is fixed at a certain sum, and this sum includes all personal property assessed to one owner. Dogs being assessed in the list of personal property makes no increase in the emoluments of the assessor. See section 69, W. S. 1872, p. 1172. Therefore, judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 Mo. 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-chariton-county-mo-1885.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack