Williams v. Chariton County

85 Mo. 645
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided April 15, 1885·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Under the authority of the case of Shed v. Ry. Co., 67 Mo. 687, no fees are allowed an officer except where expressly given and allowed by law. Moreover the compensation of assessors, except in St. Louis county, is fixed at a certain sum, and this sum includes all personal property assessed to one owner. Dogs being assessed in the list of personal property makes no increase in the emoluments of the assessor. See section 69, W. S. 1872, p. 1172. Therefore, judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Chariton County, 85 Mo. 645 (Mo. 1885).

85 Mo. 645 (Williams v. Chariton County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Opinion No. 97-79 (1979)
Missouri Attorney General Reports, 1979
Opinion No. 203-76 (1976)
Missouri Attorney General Reports, 1976
State ex rel. Forsee v. Cowan
284 S.W.2d 478 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1955)
Maxwell v. Andrew County
146 S.W.2d 621 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1941)
County of Nodaway v. Kidder
129 S.W.2d 857 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1939)
Scott and Morrison v. Endicott
38 S.W.2d 67 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1931)
State Ex Rel. Buder v. Hackmann
265 S.W. 532 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1924)
State ex rel. Evans v. Gordon
245 Mo. 12 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1912)
Jefferson Bank v. Merchants Refrigrating Co.
139 S.W. 545 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1911)
Sanderson v. Pike County
93 S.W. 942 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1906)
Jackson County v. Stone
68 S.W. 926 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1902)
State ex rel. Troll v. Brown
47 S.W. 504 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1898)
State ex rel. Wedeking v. McCracken
60 Mo. App. 650 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1895)