Williams v. Central Missouri Pizza, Inc.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Williams v. Central Missouri Pizza, Inc.

225 S.W.3d 431, 2007 Mo. LEXIS 102, 2007 WL 1693059

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedJune 12, 2007

DocketNo. SC 88217

StatusPublished

This text of 225 S.W.3d 431 (Williams v. Central Missouri Pizza, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Central Missouri Pizza, Inc., 225 S.W.3d 431, 2007 Mo. LEXIS 102, 2007 WL 1693059 (Mo. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Andrea Williams worked for a pizza delivery service. She was scheduled to work Christmas eve beginning at 5:00 p.m. Although requested to do so, her supervisor declined to adjust the schedule. Williams did not report for work as scheduled and was discharged.

Williams sought unemployment benefits. The commission determined Williams was discharged for misconduct connected with her work and denied benefits. Williams appeals.

The order of the commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An opinion would have no precedential value. The commission’s decision is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Andrea Williams worked for a pizza delivery service. She was scheduled to work Christmas eve beginning at 5:00 p.m. Although requested to do so, her supervisor declined to adjust the schedule. Williams did not report for work as scheduled and was discharged.

Williams sought unemployment benefits. The commission determined Williams was discharged for misconduct connected with her work and denied benefits. Williams appeals.

The order of the commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An opinion would have no precedential value. The commission’s decision is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 S.W.3d 431, 2007 Mo. LEXIS 102, 2007 WL 1693059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-central-missouri-pizza-inc-mo-2007.