Williams v. Central Missouri Pizza, Inc.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Williams v. Central Missouri Pizza, Inc.

225 S.W.3d 431, 2007 Mo. LEXIS 102, 2007 WL 1693059

Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided June 12, 2007·No. No. SC 88217·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Andrea Williams worked for a pizza delivery service. She was scheduled to work Christmas eve beginning at 5:00 p.m. Although requested to do so, her supervisor declined to adjust the schedule. Williams did not report for work as scheduled and was discharged.

Williams sought unemployment benefits. The commission determined Williams was discharged for misconduct connected with her work and denied benefits. Williams appeals.

The order of the commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An opinion would have no precedential value. The commission’s decision is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Andrea Williams worked for a pizza delivery service. She was scheduled to work Christmas eve beginning at 5:00 p.m. Although requested to do so, her supervisor declined to adjust the schedule. Williams did not report for work as scheduled and was discharged.

Williams sought unemployment benefits. The commission determined Williams was discharged for misconduct connected with her work and denied benefits. Williams appeals.

The order of the commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An opinion would have no precedential value. The commission’s decision is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

All concur.

Williams v. Central Missouri Pizza, Inc., 225 S.W.3d 431, 2007 Mo. LEXIS 102, 2007 WL 1693059 (Mo. 2007).

Pincite

225 S.W.3d 431 (Williams v. Central Missouri Pizza, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.