Williams v. Cavedo

Fourth Circuit

Williams v. Cavedo

583 F. App'x 256

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 26, 2014·No. No. 14-7002·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gary Buterra Williams appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Cavedo, No. 3:13-cv-00672-HEH (E.D. Va. Mar. 4 & June 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gary Buterra Williams appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Cavedo, No. 3:13-cv-00672-HEH (E.D. Va. Mar. 4 & June 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Williams v. Cavedo, 583 F. App'x 256 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

583 F. App'x 256 (Williams v. Cavedo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related