Williams v. Case

14 Ind. 253
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 2, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 14 Ind. 253 (Williams v. Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Case, 14 Ind. 253 (Ind. 1860).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Suit by the assignees upon the assignment of a note. Averment that one of the makers was insolvent, &c., and that judgment had been duly recovered and execution issued and returned no property found, &c., as to the other. Answer, first, general denial; secondly, that diligence had not been used against the makers, &c.

Upon the trial the proof was, that one of the makers was insolvent. The record of a judgment against the other, and the memorandum thereon of the justice that [254]*254an execution had issued and been returned no property found, was given in evidence. The execution itself does not appear to have been introduced nor accounted for. It was the best evidence.

R. A. Chandler, for the appellants. I. A. Rice and A. A. Rice, for the appellees.

Per Curiam.—

The judgment is reversed with costs, Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nietert v. Trentman
4 N.E. 306 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Splahn v. Gillespie
48 Ind. 397 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1874)
Woodburn Sarven Wheel Co. v. McKernan
1 Wilson 48 (Indiana Super. Ct., 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Ind. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-case-ind-1860.