Williams v. Carlson

110 S.E. 69, 118 S.C. 46, 1921 S.C. LEXIS 196
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedDecember 19, 1921
Docket10784
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 110 S.E. 69 (Williams v. Carlson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Carlson, 110 S.E. 69, 118 S.C. 46, 1921 S.C. LEXIS 196 (S.C. 1921).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

This is an appeal from' an order of County Judge Whaley, dissolving an attachment of an automobile. The exceptions, five in number, are all overruled, because the affidavit is fatally defective, under Section 281, Vol. 2, Code of Laws 1912, which requires that an affidavit shall be presented “specifying the amount of the claim and the grounds thereof.” It must also appear by affidavit that a cause of action exists against defendant. His Honor committed no error in dissolving the attachment.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woodworth v. Skeen
150 S.E. 764 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 S.E. 69, 118 S.C. 46, 1921 S.C. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-carlson-sc-1921.